Most solicitor firms approach SEO with a vague expectation of 'more enquiries.' That ambiguity is expensive. Without a clear model of what a successful campaign looks like financially, there is no basis for deciding how much to invest, how long to wait, or whether results are actually good.
ROI modelling changes that. It forces clarity on three questions before any work begins:
- What is a new client actually worth to this firm?
- At what conversion rate does organic traffic become profitable?
- How many months of investment does the firm need to sustain before the returns compound?
These are not marketing questions — they are business planning questions. A personal injury firm with an average case value of £8,000 and a 20% close rate on consultations is working with very different economics than a high-street firm charging fixed fees for residential conveyancing.
The model does not need to be precise to be useful. A conservative estimate with honest assumptions is more valuable than a glossy projection. The point is to establish a financial threshold: if SEO delivers X enquiries per month, the campaign pays for itself — and above that threshold, it scales.
Once that threshold is clear, decisions about budget, scope, and patience become much easier to make. Firms that skip this step often cancel campaigns in month four — just before results typically begin compounding — because they have no framework to evaluate whether progress is on track.
Disclaimer: The frameworks here are educational. Actual financial outcomes depend on your specific market, team, case mix, and operational factors outside SEO's scope. This is not financial or legal advice.