Before comparing numbers, it helps to understand the three structures you'll encounter when evaluating real estate SEO providers.
Monthly Retainer (Most Common)
A recurring engagement where the agency or consultant handles ongoing optimization, content creation, link building, and reporting. This is the dominant model for real estate SEO because organic search is a long-term channel — it requires consistent effort to build and maintain rankings.
Retainers give you predictable costs and sustained momentum. The trade-off is that you're committing before you see results, which is why provider selection matters significantly.
Project-Based Fees
A one-time scope: typically a technical audit, site architecture overhaul, or a content buildout of neighborhood and service-area pages. Project fees make sense when your site has a specific structural problem or when you want a foundation built before layering on ongoing work.
Standalone projects without ongoing maintenance often stall. Real estate markets shift, competitors publish new content, and algorithms update — a one-time project doesn't account for any of that.
Performance-Based Pricing
Some providers charge based on ranking improvements or lead volume. This sounds attractive but introduces its own risks: providers may prioritize easy keyword wins over high-intent targets, and attribution in real estate is genuinely complex. A buyer who finds you organically may close months later through a referral chain.
Performance pricing works best as a hybrid — a reduced base retainer plus a results bonus — rather than a pure pay-for-rankings structure.
What most growing brokerages use: a monthly retainer with a defined scope, quarterly check-ins on deliverables, and clearly defined KPIs (organic sessions, ranking position for target neighborhoods, and inbound inquiry volume).