Most photographers approach SEO as a marketing cost. The more useful frame is to treat it as a client acquisition channel with a measurable cost-per-booking — the same way you'd evaluate a bridal show booth, a styled shoot investment, or a referral partnership.
When you reframe it that way, the question stops being "is SEO expensive?" and becomes "how many bookings does SEO need to generate before it pays for itself?" For most photographers, that number is smaller than they expect.
The math varies significantly by niche. A wedding photographer charging $5,000 per package needs one organic booking to cover several months of professional SEO. A headshot photographer charging $250 per session needs twenty. Neither is inherently better — they just require different SEO strategies and different timelines to justify the investment.
There's also a compounding dimension that paid advertising doesn't have. Ad spend is linear: spend $500, get $500 worth of visibility. Stop spending, visibility stops. SEO builds authority in Google's index over time. A page that earns strong rankings in month 6 keeps generating traffic in month 18, month 24, and beyond — without proportional increases in cost. That's the core financial argument for SEO as a channel.
This page walks through how to model ROI for your specific niche, what realistic timelines look like, and how to track whether your SEO is actually working.