Insurance SEO vendors use three primary pricing structures. Understanding the mechanics of each helps you choose the right one for your firm's size, risk tolerance, and goals.
Monthly Retainer
The most common model. You pay a fixed monthly fee for an ongoing scope of work—typically technical maintenance, content production, link building, and reporting. Retainers create accountability and predictable output, but the burden is on you to verify deliverables are actually being completed.
Best for: Independent agencies and regional carriers who want steady, compounding organic growth over 12+ months.
Project-Based Pricing
A defined scope with a fixed price—most often used for technical audits, website migrations, or a single content sprint. Projects have clear start and end dates, making budget approval easier in larger organizations.
Best for: Firms that need a diagnostic before committing to ongoing spend, or that have an internal team who will execute after the strategy is delivered.
Performance-Based Pricing
You pay based on rankings achieved or leads generated. This sounds appealing, but carries real risk in insurance: ranking for the wrong keywords produces traffic with no conversion value, and payment structures can incentivize volume over quality. Many reputable agencies avoid pure performance models for this reason.
Best for: High-volume lead generation programs where attribution is clean and the insurance product converts predictably online. Rare in practice.
A hybrid model—smaller base retainer plus a performance bonus at defined milestones—is increasingly common for mid-market insurers who want shared risk without purely chasing vanity metrics.