What FTC Guidelines, State Medical Boards, and Advertising Regulations Actually Require From Your Practice's Marketing

The Federal Trade Commission regulates advertising claims across all industries, but healthcare marketing receives particular scrutiny. The FTC's Endorsement Guides, updated in 2023, establish baseline requirements that apply regardless of your state's medical board rules.

Testimonials and Typical Results

Patient testimonials must reflect honest opinions based on actual experience. More importantly, if your marketing features exceptional outcomes, you must either clearly disclose that results aren't typical or have substantiation that such results are, in fact, representative of what patients generally achieve.

The old "results may vary" disclaimer no longer provides adequate protection. If a testimonial describes dramatic weight loss, pain elimination, or cosmetic transformation, the FTC expects either evidence that most patients achieve similar results or clear, prominent disclosure of typical outcomes.

Material Connections

Any relationship that might affect a testimonial's credibility must be disclosed. This includes:

• Patients who received discounted or free services in exchange for reviews
• Staff members or their family members providing testimonials
• Influencers or content creators with any compensation arrangement
• Patients participating in referral programs where testimonials generate rewards

Disclosures must be clear and conspicuous—not buried in fine print or hidden behind "more" links on social media. The standard is whether a reasonable consumer would notice and understand the disclosure.

This is educational content, not legal advice. Consult healthcare marketing counsel for guidance specific to your campaigns.

While FTC guidelines create a federal baseline, state medical boards impose additional—and often stricter—advertising requirements. These rules vary significantly, making multi-state practices particularly complex to market.

Common State Board Prohibitions

Most state medical boards restrict or prohibit:

• Superlative claims: "Best surgeon in [city]" or "top-rated practice" without objective substantiation
• Guarantees of outcomes: Promising specific results from treatment
• Misleading credentials: Implying board certifications or specialties not actually held
• False or deceptive statements: Any claim that could mislead patients about qualifications, experience, or results

State-Specific Examples

California's Medical Practice Act requires that any claim of board certification specify the certifying board and whether it's ABMS-recognized. Texas Medical Board rules prohibit advertising that "is not readily subject to verification" and require specific disclosures for certain cosmetic procedures.

Florida's Board of Medicine mandates that testimonials include disclaimers that results may vary and that the testimonial doesn't guarantee similar outcomes. New York requires disclosure of physician-ownership interests in facilities advertised.

Credential and Specialty Claims

How you describe specialization matters significantly. Many states restrict use of "specialist" terminology unless you hold board certification in that specialty. Fellowship training or focused practice areas may need careful language to avoid implying certification you don't possess.

Rules change—verify current advertising requirements with your state medical board before launching new campaigns.

Patient reviews and testimonials represent both a marketing necessity and a compliance challenge. The rules apply whether you're featuring quotes on your website, responding to Google reviews, or sharing patient stories on social media.

What You Can and Cannot Do With Reviews

Generally permissible:

• Asking satisfied patients to share their experience on review platforms (without scripting or incentivizing specific content)
• Displaying authentic, unedited patient testimonials with appropriate disclosures
• Responding to reviews with general practice information (while maintaining HIPAA compliance)

Generally problematic:

• Offering discounts, gifts, or other incentives for positive reviews without clear disclosure
• Editing patient testimonials to make results sound more dramatic
• Cherry-picking only exceptional outcomes without disclosing typicality
• Compensating patients for testimonials without disclosure of the arrangement

The Intersection With HIPAA

Review responses create unique compliance challenges. Even acknowledging someone is your patient technically confirms protected health information. Many practices adopt policies of responding only with general information that neither confirms nor denies the patient relationship. Our HIPAA compliance guide covers patient review response protocols in detail.

Social Media Testimonials

Patient success stories shared on Instagram, TikTok, or Facebook carry the same FTC and state board requirements as website testimonials. Video testimonials need verbal or on-screen disclosures, not just description text that viewers might miss. Patient authorization for social media differs from HIPAA authorization—both may be required.

Before/after imagery drives significant patient interest, particularly for cosmetic, dermatologic, and weight management practices. These photos also carry the highest compliance risk in medical advertising.

Common Disclosure Requirements

Most regulatory frameworks expect before/after photos to include:

• Whether the results shown are typical or exceptional
• Any photo enhancements, lighting differences, or editing applied
• The timeframe between photos
• Whether the patient received additional treatments affecting results
• Patient authorization for commercial use of their images

State-Specific Before/After Rules

Some states impose detailed requirements. California's Medical Board has issued guidance on cosmetic surgery before/after photos requiring disclosure of whether results are representative. Florida requires that before/after images not be "deceptive or misleading" and mandates certain disclaimers for cosmetic procedures.

Platform-Specific Policies

Beyond regulatory requirements, advertising platforms impose their own rules. Google Ads restricts before/after imagery for certain procedure types. Meta's advertising policies prohibit images that imply unrealistic expectations or focus excessively on specific body parts. Violating platform policies can result in ad account suspension—a separate consequence from regulatory issues.

Documentation Practices

Maintain records of:

• Patient authorization forms specifically covering marketing use
• Original, unedited photos alongside any enhanced versions used
• The disclosures and disclaimers used with each image set
• The platforms and contexts where images were published

This documentation provides defense if a board investigator or FTC inquiry questions your practices later.

Understanding how compliance issues typically surface helps practices prioritize protective measures. Enforcement doesn't happen randomly—certain patterns attract regulatory attention.

Common Triggers for Board Investigations

Competitor complaints: Other practices in your market may file complaints about advertising they consider misleading or non-compliant. State boards are required to investigate formal complaints.

Patient complaints: Patients who feel misled by advertising—particularly when outcomes don't match expectations set by marketing—may file board complaints as part of broader grievances.

Board monitoring: Some state boards actively monitor physician advertising, particularly in competitive specialties like cosmetic surgery and pain management. California and Texas have conducted targeted advertising audits.

FTC sweeps: The FTC periodically conducts enforcement sweeps focused on specific industries or advertising practices. Healthcare testimonials and endorsements have been focus areas.

Potential Consequences

Advertising violations can result in:

• Board investigation and the associated time, stress, and legal costs
• Requirements to modify or remove advertising
• Public reprimands or citations appearing on your license record
• Fines (amounts vary by state and violation severity)
• License probation or, in extreme cases, suspension
• FTC consent orders requiring ongoing compliance monitoring

Proactive Protection

Practices that document their compliance reasoning—why specific claims are substantiated, how disclosures were crafted, what training staff received—have stronger positions if questions arise. The existence of a thoughtful compliance process, even if imperfect, demonstrates good faith.

Compliance doesn't mean ineffective marketing. Many successful practices build patient acquisition systems that work within regulatory boundaries—it simply requires more intentional strategy.

What Works Within Compliance Frameworks

Educational content marketing: Detailed information about conditions, treatments, and what patients should expect positions your practice as authoritative without making claims that trigger scrutiny. This approach aligns well with SEO—search engines reward comprehensive, helpful content.

Credential-focused positioning: Emphasizing verifiable credentials, actual training, published research, and professional affiliations builds credibility through facts rather than superlatives. "Board-certified plastic surgeon with fellowship training at [institution]" is more defensible than "top surgeon in the area."

Properly disclosed testimonials: Patient stories remain powerful when handled correctly. Clear disclosures, representative outcomes, and authentic voices can drive conversions while staying compliant.

SEO Within Advertising Rules

Search engine optimization operates somewhat differently than direct advertising, but your website content still falls under FTC and state board jurisdiction. The service pages, procedure descriptions, and practice information you optimize for search must meet the same truthfulness and substantiation standards.

Working with an SEO provider experienced in healthcare marketing—one who understands both search algorithms and regulatory constraints—helps you build visibility without creating compliance exposure. Our approach to regulation-compliant SEO for medical practices builds this consideration into strategy from the start.

Ongoing Compliance Maintenance

Advertising compliance isn't a one-time project. Rules evolve, new guidance issues, and your marketing materials accumulate over time. Establish periodic reviews of all active advertising—website content, social media, paid campaigns, printed materials—to catch issues before regulators or competitors do.

This guide provides educational overview, not legal advice. Consult healthcare marketing attorneys for compliance review of your specific advertising materials.