SEO pricing is not arbitrary. For counseling practices specifically, four variables determine what a realistic engagement costs:
- Market competition: A solo therapist in a mid-size city competes against a handful of practices and Psychology Today profiles. A group practice in a major metro competes against telehealth platforms, hospital systems, and dozens of well-established local practices. More competition means more content, more links, and more technical work — all of which cost more.
- Scope of services: Local SEO alone (Google Business Profile optimization, directory citations, review strategy) is the narrowest and least expensive scope. Full-service SEO adds keyword research, content production, technical audits, and ongoing link building — each adds to monthly investment.
- Practice type: Solo practitioners typically need fewer pages, narrower keyword targets, and simpler site architecture. Group practices with multiple specialties, locations, or clinicians need proportionally more work.
- Current baseline: A practice launching a new website starts with no authority, no indexed content, and no citation history. A practice with an existing site that just needs optimization and fresh content reaches results faster — and often at lower ongoing cost.
In our experience working with healthcare-adjacent practices, the biggest pricing mistakes come from comparing quotes without accounting for scope differences. A $400/month retainer and a $2,000/month retainer are rarely offering the same deliverables, even when both call it "SEO."
One factor unique to counselors: content must be handled carefully. Mental health content touches HIPAA-adjacent privacy concerns and falls under ACA Code of Ethics guidelines on advertising (Section C.6). An agency unfamiliar with these constraints may publish content that creates compliance friction — which adds cost later, not savings now.